<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Resonance &#187; Shia LaBeouf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/tag/shia-labeouf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance</link>
	<description>Popular Culture Disruptions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:02:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Run Indy Run!</title>
		<link>http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/2008/06/12/run-indy-run/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/2008/06/12/run-indy-run/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cate Blanchett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Lucas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harrison Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hurt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shia LaBeouf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nostalgia only goes so far, and then there was about 1 1/2 hours left until the end.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/indy.jpg" rel='lytebox[run-indy-run]'><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-267 alignleft" title="Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" src="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/indy-67x100.jpg" alt="" width="67" height="100" /></a><code> </code>Oh how my heart was racing as I sat in my seat waiting for <strong>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</strong>. The theme music, the whip, the hat, the aliens! What the hell do you mean Indiana Jones encounters aliens! Who&#8217;s stupid idea was it to have aliens in this movie. That&#8217;s exactly what I wanted, aliens and Indy. I now officially declare aliens and Indy to be an oxymoron, they make no sense at all.<span id="more-266"></span></p>
<p>I love Indiana Jones. Heck, I want to be Indiana Jones, minus all the snakes, spiders, bugs, guns&#8230; Okay so maybe I just want to be the adventurer archaeologist.  I have to say that Harrison Ford looked great in his fedora.  The years have been kind in a rugged way, and he hasn&#8217;t lost that Indy touch.  However, the rest of the cast and the film itself has lost the Indy touch.</p>
<p>As far as the story goes, we get Indy on his to find out another mystery.  This time it deals with a crystal skull, that we eventually discover is potentially from a downed UFO and therefore an alien.  We are introduced to the baddies of the film which include Col. Dr. Irina Spalko (Cate Blanchett) as the evil Russian mind melter something or other.  The plot degenerates from there.  Moving right along after a great chase sequence, Indy finds himself on a nuclear test site for no reason except we get some neat graphics of him in a refrigerator flying through the air.  And a really bad gopher.  I never said Indiana Jones was believable, and in most cases you tend to overlook that when watching any Indiana Jones film.  Somewhere along the way we are introduced to Mutt Williams (Shia LaBeouf), who really got on my nerves.  Right from the start, his character reeks of bad acting and even worse future Indy styling.  Indy needs to save Mutt&#8217;s mom (which is a highlight as Karen Allen reprises her role as Marion Ravenwood) and his adopted dad (another minor highlight as Professor Henry &#8216;Ox&#8217; Oxley is played by John Hurt), which miracle upon miracle, is wrapped up in the crystal skull craze.  Move the action to the jungle and cue more chases.  Finally we reach the ultimate answer the crystal skulls, aliens.  Fucking aliens.</p>
<p>My venom knows no bounds when it comes to the fact that even if a film is unbelievable, there are bounds to the unbelievability.  With Indiana Jones, the wild and unbelievable artifact was always at least somewhat rooted in threads of believability.  The arc is a believable legend, as well as the holy grail.  But for some reason, aliens do not seem rooted in anything but someone&#8217;s (Spielberg) obsession with aliens.  Crystal skulls have many legends attached to them including aliens, but legends and seeing a fucking alien open up a dimensional portal are two entirely different things.  I can accept all of the action, it fits Indy.  I can accept some bad acting, I did for three other Indy films.  But I cannot accept aliens.  Therefore I present my final verdict.</p>
<p>There is no reason to see this film unless you can overlook the fact that it is a bad film and just want to revel that Harrison Ford can still be Indiana Jones.  I would rather go back and watch all three other Indy films than watch this one again.  My frustration with this film is comparable to the unforgivable Lucas doing more Star Wars films.  Oh gee, you mean Lucas was involved with this too.  Now it all makes sense.  Look, Indiana Jones will always be a crowd pleaser and a money maker, but enough is enough.  Shia will not be the next Indiana and there should be no more Indiana Jones films.  I suggest you watch <strong>National Treasure: Book of Secrets</strong> instead.  You heard me, it was more entertaining.  So long Indy, you will always have a place in my heart but now that place has a little black spot I call, <strong>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/2008/06/12/run-indy-run/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Than Meets the Eye &#8230; Really It Does</title>
		<link>http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/2007/12/18/more-than-meets-the-eye-really-it-does-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/2007/12/18/more-than-meets-the-eye-really-it-does-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Turturro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shia LaBeouf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was never really into Transformers as a kid, I was much more a G.I. Joe boy. I though I would prep myself for the inevitable G.I. Joe re-envisioning. I have nothing against the Autobots and Decepticons, but Michael Bay is a whole different story. Actually after watching the film, Bay makes perfect sense. Surprisingly, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/transformers.jpg" title="Transformers" rel='lytebox[more-than-meets-the-eye-really-it-does-2]'><img src="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/transformers.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Transformers" height="100" width="73" /></a>I was never really into Transformers as a kid, I was much more a G.I. Joe boy.  I though I would prep myself for the inevitable G.I. Joe re-envisioning.  I have nothing against the Autobots and Decepticons, but Michael Bay is a whole different story.  Actually after watching the film, Bay makes perfect sense.  Surprisingly, the film makes perfect sense as well.  It wasn&#8217;t great, but I was entertained thanks to Bay.  I guess he did get this one right since the more you think about <em>Transformers</em> for meaning and reality, the less it makes sense.  Gimme the robots kicking each other&#8217;s autobutts.<span id="more-133"></span></p>
<p>I had no intentions of watching this film, but I couldn&#8217;t resist recapturing my youth since I saw an article about <em>Thundercats</em>, <em>G.I. Joe</em>, and <em>Voltron</em> films in production or the planning stages.  <em>Transformers</em> was fun and entertaining with very cool special effects.  I actually hate to admit that I did like the film.  I am in no way endorsing a second one however.  I think that films such as this exist because my generation wants to see what it would be like to have our toys exist on the screen.  Animation just doesn&#8217;t cut it anymore.  What surprised me the most was the acting in the film.</p>
<p>I fully understand why Shia LaBeouf is considered a hot property in Hollywood.  As Sam Witwicky, he is hero who falls into the <em>Transformer</em> story.  In general, the cast is interesting but does fade together throughout the film, but LaBeouf has the ability to rise out of the muddle and create a connection with the viewer.  Perhaps it&#8217;s because when we were playing with Optimus Prime, we were Sam.  The story is dependent upon the viewer transferring our hopes and dreams with Sam.  LaBeouf has the ability to be charming, an idiot, hilarious, and a hero all within the confines of acting with a robot.  His love interest Mikaela Banes (Megan Fox) hurts and helps this.  Megan Fox is hot, no doubt, but her acting borders eye candy and just enough.  I think her character would be a great research project for a psychology class because it is obvious that her jailed father and bad taste in men define her character.  Which makes it even more meaningful that she chooses Sam, or perhaps it makes it a necessity of the plot to keep her on camera.  I am willing to give her the benefit of the doubt and wait until I see her in more films and reruns of <em>Hope and Faith</em>.  I also want to mention that John Turturro&#8217;s Agent Simmons is a great little role.  He&#8217;s quickly becoming an actor I look for in a film.</p>
<p>The biggest stars in the film are the Transformers.  The voice acting is great and the transformation moments are well done, but you never really go beyond the &#8220;this is CGI&#8221; effect.  Early in the film the transformations are handled slowly, setting up the first few aha moments.  As you the film progresses, the transformation become more of a show than a plot device.</p>
<p>Speaking of plot, nah.  You know the plot and even though you know exactly where the film is going, it really doesn&#8217;t matter.  I was bothered by one aspect of the film, how in the hell do Sam and Mikaela not get injured whenever they are riding on Optimus Prime?  I know this is a small thing, but it killed my believability.  Even in a film this far from reality, it would be nice to think that I wasn&#8217;t being considered an idiot.  Is there a safety cage on his shoulder or a force field?  Are the humans actually just robots in disguise as well?  If Deckard can be a replicant, could Sam be a new Autobot prototype?  Whatever, the point is that if you introduce a gap, people are bound to see it.</p>
<p>Overall I am glad that I watched <em>Transformers</em>.  It was a great way to revisit my youth and fulfill the nagging question, is it possible to do a live-action <em>Transformers</em>.  The answer is yes, but only if your Michael Bay.  I should also mention that Megan Fox is an Angelina Jolie clone with cool tattoos.  I like tattoos and so should you.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mf1.jpg" title="Megan Fox Oil Change" rel='lytebox[more-than-meets-the-eye-really-it-does-2]'><img src="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mf1.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Megan Fox Oil Change" height="92" width="128" /></a><a href="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mf3.jpg" title="Ink" rel='lytebox[more-than-meets-the-eye-really-it-does-2]'><img src="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mf3.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Ink" height="92" width="79" /></a><a href="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mf2.jpg" title="More Ink" rel='lytebox[more-than-meets-the-eye-really-it-does-2]'><img src="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mf2.thumbnail.jpg" alt="More Ink" height="92" width="74" /></a><a href="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mf4.jpg" title="Even More Ink" rel='lytebox[more-than-meets-the-eye-really-it-does-2]'><img src="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mf4.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Even More Ink" height="92" width="72" /></a><a href="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mf5.jpg" title="Bonus for the Glasses" rel='lytebox[more-than-meets-the-eye-really-it-does-2]'><img src="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mf5.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Bonus for the Glasses" height="92" width="62" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/2007/12/18/more-than-meets-the-eye-really-it-does-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dude, That&#8217;s A Gnarly Tube</title>
		<link>http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/2007/11/21/dude-thats-a-gnarly-tube/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/2007/11/21/dude-thats-a-gnarly-tube/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children's Film Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diedrich Bader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Woods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Seinfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Heder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shia LaBeouf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zooey Deschanel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to create yet a whole other category since my daughter is now actively watching films. Now I normally would not review a children&#8217;s film because they tend to have fairly normal plots and are quite boring. I know that sounds harsh but there have been many times when I end up reading or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/surfs_up.jpg" alt="Surf’s Up" height="96" width="65" />  I had to create yet a whole other category since my daughter is now actively watching films.  Now I normally would not review a children&#8217;s film because  they tend to have fairly normal plots and are quite boring.  I know that sounds harsh but there have been many times when I end up reading or doing something else while my daughter watches <em>Dora the Explorer</em> yet again.  But I also thinks it&#8217;s important to highlight those films that are better than that and can be enjoyed by children as well as parents.  <em>Surf&#8217;s Up</em> happens to be one of those films.<span id="more-104"></span>Many children&#8217;s films give a false sense of adultness to their stories.  <em>Shrek</em> adds &#8220;adult&#8221; humor for the parents watching, while Jerry Seinfeld is a bee.  Most fail to realize that most adults do not mind a kids&#8217; movie as long as it has an interesting story and treats children with respect.  Of course kids will laugh at poop, but aiming at them laughing with a complex joke is more rewarding and respectable.  <em>Surf&#8217;s Up</em> pushes the adultness of a children&#8217;s film by manipulating the way in which we view the story.  We are supposed to believe that we are watching a documentary on surfing, penguin surfing.  Just this step moves the film from ordinary child&#8217;s fare to something that challenges the viewer.  Kids do not just accept something adults take for granted, this is an unusual way for a story to be told.  There are still some poop jokes, but at least it happens in the context of a documentary.</p>
<p>Most kids will love the penguins, who doesn&#8217;t?  Oh yeah, those that have recently watched <em>March of the Penguins</em> and <em>Happy Feet</em>.  I have to tell you, I thought <em>Happy Feet</em> was not very good.  Compared to <em>Surf&#8217;s Up</em>, <em>Happy Feet</em> is a bland regurgitation of a Disney film with forced environmental consciousnesses (which is good, but heavy handed when it&#8217;s animated penguins).  <em>Surf&#8217;s Up</em> has a fresh attitude, but suffers the problem of being another penguin film; although compared to the rest it is the one to watch.</p>
<p>My favorite aspect of the film was the voice talent.  It was fun trying to figure out who everyone was, and then laughing at how close the characters sometimes got to their voices.  Jeff Bridges as Big Z was about the best match, I kept waiting to here him say, &#8220;It&#8217;s just Z, not the Z, just Z.&#8221;  Hmm, I wonder if The Dude was his inspiration for the voice?  How about Shia LaBeouf as Cody Maverick, Zooey Deschanel as Lani Aliikai, or James Woods as Reggie Belafont.  Each one added to their character through their voice.  I was even shocked by how perfect Jon Heder was as Chicken Joe.  You see this slacker chicken surfer and wonder how many times the directors told Heder, &#8220;How about Napoleon as a chicken?&#8221;  Yes it sounds like a cop out, but Chicken Joe should be similar to Napoleon.  I was even glad to see Diedrich Bader voicing Tank Evans, which was another perfect match.  And to think that I used to like him on The Drew Carey show, it&#8217;s nice to see him working.</p>
<p>Overall, <em>Surf&#8217;s Up</em> is a fun movie that offers more than just some disguised adult humor.  It has a great story and a perfect way of presenting that story.  The characters are lovable, but not because they are cute.  They are lovable because they have personality, which is sometimes lacking in children&#8217;s films.  For those of you who have ever viewed <em>Creature Comforts</em>, much of this film will remind you of the style used for those shows.  That&#8217;s a bonus for some of us who hope a film version of <em>Creature Comforts</em> would appear.  I am glad that Surf&#8217;s Up tried something a bit different, it worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fadedrequiem.com/resonance/2007/11/21/dude-thats-a-gnarly-tube/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

